Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 12:12

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Infectious Updates 6/21/2025 - Daily Kos
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
If Iran’s Oil Is Cut Off, China Will Pay the Price - WSJ
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Bank of America predicts major housing market changes are coming soon - TheStreet
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Earth’s oldest living creature unearthed—dating back 700 million years - The Brighter Side of News
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why do older siblings always hate younger siblings?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
You probably don’t need foods with added protein, nutritionists say - NewsNation
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Are there any types of headphones or earbuds that are specifically designed for wearing overnight?